At Grupthink, you can vote for as many answers as you like, and rank them under "rank your votes." Your rankings will have an important effect on the overall results! More...
You've got it backwards - The pharmacist cannot deny the morning-after pill because his "moral" freedom is trumped by the customer's freedom to choose.
I'm confused. The pharmicist has a right to his property and has the freedom to sell it or not. However the customer does not have a right to the pharmicists product. It's not a life-saving product and she can get it elsewhere so there are no dire circumstances.
Doesn't it infringe on the pharmicists property rights to force him sell to a particular customer?
Section III of the Pharmacist's Code of Ethics states that:
"III. A pharmacist respects the autonomy and dignity of each patient.
A pharmacist promotes the right of self-determination and recognizes individual self-worth by encouraging patients to participate in decisions about their health. A pharmacist communicates with patients in terms that are understandable. In all cases, a pharmacist respects personal and cultural differences among patients."
Regardless, it seems that the US legal system has upheld the right of a pharmacist to deny Plan B at their discretion; I still think that's just as wrong, though, as a doctor denying treatment to an African-American because they are morally opposed to "Negroes".
Comments |
Leave a comment
God is a big nose!!!!!!
For clarification: So a pharmacist can deny the morning-after pill because the customer has no right to the product from that vendor?
You've got it backwards - The pharmacist cannot deny the morning-after pill because his "moral" freedom is trumped by the customer's freedom to choose.
I'm confused. The pharmicist has a right to his property and has the freedom to sell it or not. However the customer does not have a right to the pharmicists product. It's not a life-saving product and she can get it elsewhere so there are no dire circumstances.
Doesn't it infringe on the pharmicists property rights to force him sell to a particular customer?
Section III of the Pharmacist's Code of Ethics states that:
"III. A pharmacist respects the autonomy and dignity of each patient.
A pharmacist promotes the right of self-determination and recognizes individual self-worth by encouraging patients to participate in decisions about their health. A pharmacist communicates with patients in terms that are understandable. In all cases, a pharmacist respects personal and cultural differences among patients."
http://www.uspharmd....f_Ethics.html
Regardless, it seems that the US legal system has upheld the right of a pharmacist to deny Plan B at their discretion; I still think that's just as wrong, though, as a doctor denying treatment to an African-American because they are morally opposed to "Negroes".
I wonder if a Jehovah's Witness could refuse to sell birthday candles to a paying customer....
I see. Apparently I picked a really bad example. What with the code of ethics.
Well, it _is_ loose enough to be up to each individual's interpretation.