Would you say that the darker people are, the more acceptable it is to kill them?
(public topic in Observing The World)
1. |
 |
||
2. |
 |
||
 |
Add a new answer! |
Page 1 of 1
Topic Details
This topic was started by Goliath 
on April 22nd, 2008. 4 grupies have voted on one or more of the 2 answers.
Tags: embargo, genocide, history, humanitarianism, war
Comments |
Leave a comment
Seems that when genocide occurs in Africa, it is black on black crime. When genocide happens in Europe, it is white on white crime. So history has little to support any answer that some one may add to this topic.
The American Slave Trade
South African Apartheid
Native Americans
Vietnamese
Hawaii
Mayans and Aztecs
Arabs
Your right, Ok white people do kill and or take the land of darker skinned people. Yet the darkness of the skin is not the motivation, their land or what ever it was that lead to slavery is the reason white people did those things.
Yah... But if the shoe was on the other foot for a day there would be hysteria on the news networks. I think if the people in East Timor were white they would be like OMFG! People are dying! We have to do something!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hvl_D7Z5emU
More specifically my question is based on "NEWS worthy" topics.