What do you think of the Da Vinci Code?

Avatar Image   Started by tdresser tdresser has 2,698 Grupie Points 2 years ago         Comments 6 Comments

Was it worth reading? Good? Bad? Terrible?

Should it be as popular as it is?

Tags: book, books, faith


 
       
Page 1 of 1
1.  

Never Read it.

Leader! Most 1st Place Votes
(No description provided)

Comments Add a comment

 
35  votes
2.  

Good Fiction.

(No description provided)

Comments Add a comment

 
30  votes
3.  

Badly written.

Flat characters, and the whole cliffhanger every two-pages thing gets old pretty fast.

Comments Add a comment

 
17  votes
4.  

Historically inaccurate.

He could have at least gotten the dates of stuff right, and done a bit of research.

Comments Add a comment

 
15  votes
5.  

I read it, but wouldn't re-read it.

A decent enough time-filler. The book's done just well enough to make you spend the time considering just how poorly done it is.

Comments Add a comment

 
14  votes
6.  
 
8  votes
7.  

I prefer Angels & Demons

When world-renowned Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon is summoned to a Swiss research facility to analyze a mysterious symbol -- ... [show more]

Comments 1 Comment

 
7  votes
8.  

Patronising and preachy

(No description provided)

Comments Add a comment

 
5  votes
9.  

Movie was alright

(No description provided)

Comments Add a comment

 
4  votes
10.  

Page turner.

Loved it and wanted it to be true, Angels and Demons was also great as was Digital Fortress.

Comments Add a comment

 
4  votes
11.  

Three Cheers for Mary Magdalene!

I first heard the story of Mary Magdalene over 25 years ago. The book may be a bit overboard, but I do believe 3 things: 1. Mary... [show more]

Comments Add a comment

 
3  votes
  Add a new answer!  
 
Page 1 of 1

Comments  |  Leave a comment Leave a comment

Avatar Image
   +13.4  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
HappyThawts 2 years ago

As "informative" as The Davinci Code was, I found it to be one of those "try-hard" books. Where the author just tries to push all this information on you in an attempt to sway you to his beliefs. I'm not sure if Dan Brown even believes in what he wrote in this book, but you'd think if he was going to write about something so controversial he would at least put more effort into his research. Studying art history myself has shown me many holes in his theories and explanations for things he said there was no explanation for. But if you forget all of that, and take it for a complete work of fiction and try and enjoy it for what it is, I find it is merely a mediocre book at best.

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link
Avatar Image
   +4.5  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
Aoterra 2 years ago

I find his books patronising in the extreme. He can't wait to tell you how clever he (the author) is, and the book takes whole sections out of the narrative to lecture you about something he knows, and thinks you (the reader) don't. If you like to be patronised, give it a shot, otherwise, don't bother.

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link
Avatar Image
   +7.1  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
jody 2 years ago

I'd agree, Aoterra. But just consider the readers he's writing for--people who may not have any idea about any of the legends circulating around the holy grail, people who likely haven't even heard of the holy grail (yes, these people exist in far greater numbers than you'd think). It reminds of an informal survey a parish priest did in the late 1500s in England (right around when the Reformation was about hit the island full on, right when you'd think religion would be a hot topic)--he found that some parishoners didn't know the name "Jesus Christ." That sort of willful obtuseness is exactly what Dan Brown's books depend on.

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link
Avatar Image
   +5.8  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
Aoterra 2 years ago

Jody, while I understand with your comments, it saddens me that people are so ill-informed, and that our world is so screwed up that one man with a word-processor can make so much money from people's ignorance.
Oh, and I didn't enjoy the writing either.

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link
Avatar Image
   +7.1  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
jody 2 years ago

Aoterra, about the writing, you couldn't be more right: A.O. Scott in the NYTimes called the book, "Dan Brown's best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence."

http://movies2.nytim...s/18code.html

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link
Avatar Image
   +3.4  Thumbs down Thumbs up   
key_of_A 2 years ago

Yes, thank God that all of us here are absolutely BRILLIANT!
Those poor dupes who bought this book by the scores of millions and kept in on the best seller list for nearly four years should look to US for true intellectual guidance and literature. Why, anyone who can't write the best selling book of the modern era, (if we only took the time, of course) shouldn't even be allowed to buy a book. Hrmmph.

Reply to this comment  Reply     Link to this comment Link

Topic Details

This topic was started by tdresser tdresser has 2,698 Grupie Points on May 20th, 2006. 104 grupies have voted on one or more of the 11 answers.

Tags: book, books, faith

Please login or register to see other notification options.